: The value of assets
gradually reduces on account of use. Such reduction in value is known asdepreciation.
Different authors have given different definitions of depreciation, such
as:"Depreciation may be defined as the permanent continuous diminution in
the quality, quantity or value on an asset." (By
Pickles)"Depreciation is the gradual permanent decrease in the value of an
asset from any cause." (By Carter)"Depreciation may be defined
as a measure of the exhaustion of the effective life of an asset from any cause
during a given period." (By Spicer & Pegler)Depreciation is the
diminution in intrinsic value of an asset due to use and/or the lapse of
time." (By Institute of Cost and Management Accountants, England)
"Depreciation is the reduction in the value of a fixed
asset occasioned by physical wear and tear, obsolescence or the passage of
time." (Northcott & Forsyth)"Depreciation is the diminution
in the value of assets owing to wear and tear, effluscion of time, obsolescence
or similar causes." (Cropper)From the above definitions, it follows
that an asset gradually declines on account of use and passage of time and this
causes permanent reduction in the value and utility of asset. Such reduction in
the value or utility of asset is called depreciation. In other words, expired
cost or utility of asset is depreciation.
The main causes of depreciation may be divided into two
categories, namely:
1.
Internal Cause and
2.
External Causes
Internal
Causes:
Depreciation which occurs for certain inherent normal causes, is
known as internal depreciation. The main causes of internal depreciation are:
Wear
and Tear:
Some assets physically deteriorate due to wear and tear in use.
More and more use of an asset, the greater would be the wear and tear. Physical
deterioration of an asset is caused from movement, strain, friction, erasion
etc. An obvious example of this is motor car which rapidly wears out. Other
assets like this are building, plant, machinery, furniture, etc. The wear and
tear is general but primary cause of depreciation.
Depletion:
Some assets declines in value proportionate to the quantum of
production, e.g. mine, quarry etc. With the raising of coal from coal mine the
total deposit reduces gradually and after sometime it will be fully exhausted.
Then its value will be reduced to nil.
External
Causes:
Depreciation caused by some external reasons is called external
depreciation. The main external causes are as follows:
Obsolescence:
Some assets, although in proper working order, may become
obsolete. For example, old machine becomes obsolete with the invention of more
economical and sophisticated machine whose productive capacity is generally
larger and cost of production is therefore less. In order to survive in the
competitive market the manufacturers must must install new machines replacing
the old ones. Again, it may happen that the articles produced by old machine
are no longer saleable in the market on account of change of habit and taste of
the people. In such a case the old machine, although in good working condition,
must be discarded and the new one purchased.
Efflux
of Time:
Some assets diminish in value on account of sheer passage of
time, even though they are not used e.g., leasehold property, patent right,
copyright etc. Suppose we take a lease of a house for 10 years for $10,000. Its
annual depreciation will be $1,000 (10,000/10), irrespective of the the whether
the house has been used or not. Because with the end of lease after 10 years,
the house will go out of possession.
Accident:
Assets may be destroyed by abnormal reasons such as fire,
earthquake, flood etc. In such a case the destroyed asset must be written off
as loss and a new one purchased.
Ans2: Front office
quantitative analyst
In trading and sales operations, quantitative
analysts work to determine prices, manage risk, and identify profitable
opportunities. strategic level. Although highly skilled programmers, FOQs are
often bound by time constraints, and hacking complex tasks together
Quantitative investment
management
Quantitative
analysis is used extensively by asset managers. Some, such as AQR or Barclays,
rely almost exclusively on quantitative strategies while others, such as Pimco,
Blackrock or Citadel use a mix of quantitative and fundamental methods.
Virtually all large asset managers and hedge funds rely to some degree on
quantitative methods.Library quantitative analysis Major firms invest large
sums in an attempt to produce standard methods of evaluating prices and risk.
These differ from front office tools in that Excel is very rare, with most
development being in C++, though Java and C# are sometimes used in
non-performance critical tasks. LQs spend more time modelling ensuring the
analytics are both efficient and correct, though there is tension between LQs
and FOQs on the validity of their results. LQs are required to understand
techniques such as Monte Carlo methods and finite difference methods, as well as the
nature of the products being modelled.
Algorithmic trading
quantitative analyst
Often the highest paid form of Quant, ATQs make
use of methods taken from signal
processing, game theory,
gambling Kelly criterion, market micro structure, econometrics,
and time series analysis.Algorithmic trading includes statistical arbitrage, but includes techniques
largely based upon speed of response, to the extent that some ATQs modify
hardware and Linux
Risk management
This has grown in importance in recent years, as
the credit crisis exposed holes in the mechanisms used to ensure that positions
were correctly hedged, though in no bank does the pay in risk approach that in
front office. A core technique is value at risk,
and this is backed up with various forms of stress testing and direct analysis
of the positions and models used by
Innovation
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, there
surfaced the recognition that quantitative valuation methods were generally too
narrow in their approach. An agreed upon fix adopted by numerous financial
institutions has been to improve collaboration through continuous improvement
and thought leadership. This has led to the creation of collaborative
environments in order to produce the most robust statistical models available.
Through working with a large pool of some of the world's most talented
quantitative analysts, economists and mathematicians from the financial industry
and academia, transparency continues to be improved, leading to constant
improvement.[weasel words]
Model validation
MV takes the models and methods developed by
front office, library, and modelling quants and determines their validity and
correctness. The MV group might well be seen as a superset of the quant
operations in a financial institution, since it must deal with new and advanced
new models and trading techniques from across the firm. However, the pay
structure in all firms is such that MV groups struggle to attract and retain
adequate staff, often with talented quantitative analysts leaving at the first
opportunity. This gravely impacts corporate ability to manage model risk, or to
ensure that the positions being held are correctly valued. An MV quantitative
analyst will typically earn a fraction of quantitative analysts in other groups
with similar length of experience.
Quantitative developer
Quant developers are computer specialists that
assist, implement and maintain the quant models. They tend to be highly
specialised language technicians that bridge the gap between IT and
quantitative analysts.
Techniques
A typical problem for a numerically oriented
quantitative analyst would be to develop a model for pricing, hedging, and
risk-managing a complex derivative product. Mathematically-oriented
quantitative analysts tend to have more of a reliance on numerical analysis,
and less of a reliance on statistics and econometrics. These quantitative
analysts tend to be of the psychology that prefers a deterministically
"correct" answer, as once there is agreement on input values and
market variable dynamics, there is only one correct price for any given
security (which can be demonstrated, albeit often inefficiently, through a
large volume of Monte Carlo simulations).
A typical problem for a statistically oriented
quantitative analyst would be to develop a model for deciding which stocks are
relatively expensive and which stocks are relatively cheap. The model might
include a company's book value to price ratio, its trailing earnings to price
ratio, and other accounting factors. An investment manager might implement this
analysis by buying the underpriced stocks, selling the overpriced stocks, or
both. Statistically-oriented quantitative analysts tend to have more of a
reliance on statistics and econometrics, and less of a reliance on
sophisticated numerical techniques and object-oriented programming. These
quantitative analysts tend to be of the psychology that enjoys trying to find
the best approach to modeling data, and can accept that there is no "right
answer" until time has passed and we can retrospectively see how the model
performed. Both types of quantitative analysts demand a strong knowledge of
sophisticated mathematics and computer programming proficiency.
One of the principal mathematical tools of
quantitative finance is stochastic calculus.
Ans3 The Dividend Decision is a decision made by the directors of a company. It relates to the amount
and timing of any cash payments made to the company's stockholders. The
decision is an important one for the firm as it may influence its capital
structure and stock price. In addition, the decision may determine the amount
of taxation that
stockholders pay.
There are three main factors that may influence
a firm's dividend decision:
§
Free-cash flow
§
Dividend clienteles
§
Information signalling
The
free cash flow theory of dividends
Under this theory, the dividend decision is very
simple. The firm simply pays out, as dividends, any cash that is surplus after
it invests in all available positive net present
value projects.
A key criticism of this theory is that it does
not explain the observed dividend policies of real-world companies. Most
companies pay relatively consistent dividends from one year to the next and
managers tend to prefer to pay a steadily increasing dividend rather than
paying a dividend that fluctuates dramatically from one year to the next. These
criticisms have led to the development of other models that seek to explain the
dividend decision.
Dividend
clienteles
A particular pattern of dividend payments may
suit one type of stock holder more than another; this is sometimes called the clientele effect.
A retiree may prefer to invest in a firm that provides a consistently high
dividend yield, whereas a person with a high income from employment may prefer
to avoid dividends due to their high marginal tax
rate on income. If
clienteles exist for particular patterns of dividend payments, a firm may be
able to maximise its stock price and minimise its cost of capital by catering
to a particular clientele. This model may help to explain the relatively
consistent dividend policies followed by most listed companies.
A key criticism of the idea of dividend
clienteles is that investors do not need to rely upon the firm to provide the
pattern of cash flows that they desire. An investor who would like to receive
some cash from their investment always has the option of selling a portion of
their holding. This argument is even more cogent in recent times, with the
advent of very low-cost discount stockbrokers. It remains possible that there
are taxation-based clienteles for certain types of dividend policies.
Information
signalling
A model developed by Merton Miller and Kevin Rock in 1985 suggests that dividend
announcements convey information to investors regarding the firm's future
prospects. Many earlier studies had shown that stock prices tend to increase
when an increase in dividends is announced and tend to decrease when a decrease
or omission is announced. Miller and Rock pointed out that this is likely due
to the information content of dividends.
When investors have incomplete information about
the firm (perhaps due to opaque accounting practices) they will look for other
information that may provide a clue as to the firm's future prospects. Managers
have more information than investors about the firm, and such information may
inform their dividend decisions. When managers lack confidence in the firm's
ability to generate cash flows in the future they may keep dividends constant,
or possibly even reduce the amount of dividends paid out. Conversely, managers
that have access to information that indicates very good future prospects for
the firm (e.g. a full order book) are more likely to increase dividends.
According to Grullon (2002) the information value lies in the fact that a
dividend increase signals a decrease in systematic risk (a decrease in discount
rate), the correlation between dividend changes and earnings changes has not
been proofed.
Investors can use this knowledge about managers'
behaviour to inform their decision to buy or sell the firm's stock, bidding the
price up in the case of a positive dividend surprise, or selling it down when
dividends do not meet expectations. This, in turn, may influence the dividend
decision as managers know that stock holders closely watch dividend
announcements looking for good or bad news. As managers tend to avoid sending a
negative signal to the market about the future prospects of their firm, this
also tends to lead to a dividend policy of a steady, gradually increasing
payment.
Conclusion
In a fully informed, efficient market with no taxes and no transaction
costs, the free cash flow model of the dividend decision would prevail and
firms would simply pay as a dividend any excess cash available. The observed
behaviours of firm differs markedly from such a pattern. Most firms pay a dividend
that is relatively constant over time. This pattern of behavior is likely
explained by the existence of clienteles for certain dividend policies and the
information effects of announcements of changes to dividends.
The dividend decision is usually taken by
considering at least the three questions of: how much excess cash is available?
What do our investors prefer? and What will be the effect on our stock price of
announcing the amount of the dividend?
Ans4 There are many tasks
every business needs to do if it is going to succeed. Each of these tasks is
described as being a function of a business. The following is a brief
introduction to each of these functions:
·
Human Resources - ensures the business has the
best staff for the job and that they are able to work effectively in a safe
environment;
·
Finance - will keep a record of all money coming in and going out of the
business. They have responsibility for securing finances for future expansion
and paying staff and suppliers;
·
Administration and ICT support - ensure the smooth running of the business on a
day-to-day basis. They have responsibility for clerical duties, cleaning,
computer and software support, security and health and safety;
·
Operations - have the task of producing the goods or service in the most
efficient way. This is done by making best use of the business's staff,
machinery, building and raw materials;
·
marketing and sales - will try and maximize the level of sales by carrying out market
research and promoting the goods or service through a motivated sales team;
·
Customer Service - will help the customer before and after a sale has been
made by providing information, giving advice, providing credit facilities,
delivering goods and providing after-sales support;.
The proper role of government provides a
starting point for the analysis of public finance. In theory, under certain
circumstances, private markets will allocate goods and services among
individuals efficiently (in the sense that no waste occurs and that individual
tastes are matching with the economy's productive abilities). If private
markets were able to provide efficient outcomes and if the distribution of
income were socially acceptable, then there would be little or no scope for
government. In many cases, however, conditions for private market efficiency
are violated. For example, if many people can enjoy the same good at the same
time (non-rival, non-excludable consumption), then private markets may supply
too little of that good. National defense is one example of non-rival consumption,
or of apublic good.
"Market failure" occurs when private
markets do not allocate goods or services efficiently. The existence of market
failure provides an efficiency-based rationale for collective or governmental
provision of goods and services. Externalities, public goods, informational advantages, strong
economies of scale, and network effects can cause market failures. Public
provision via a government or a voluntary association, however, is subject to
other inefficiencies, termed "government failure."
Under broad assumptions, government decisions
about the efficient scope and level of activities can be efficiently separated
from decisions about the design of taxation systems (Diamond-Mirlees separation).
In this view, public sector programs should be designed to
maximize social benefits minus costs (cost-benefit analysis),
and then revenues needed to pay for those expenditures should be raised through
a taxation system that creates the fewest
efficiency losses caused by distortion of economic activity as possible. In
practice, government budgeting or public budgeting is substantially more complicated and
often results in inefficient practices.
Government can pay for spending by borrowing
(for example, with government bonds), although borrowing is a
method of distributing tax burdens through time rather than a replacement for
taxes. Adeficit is the difference between government
spending and revenues. The accumulation of deficits over time is the total
public debt.
Deficit finance allows governments to smooth tax burdens over time, and gives
governments an important fiscal policy tool. Deficits can also narrow the
options of successor governments.
Public finance is closely connected to issues of income distribution and social equity. Governments can
reallocate income through transfer payments or by designing tax systems that treat
high-income and low-income households differently.
The Public Choice approach to public finance seeks to
explain how self-interested voters, politicians, and bureaucrats actually
operate, rather than how they should operate.
Public
finance management
Collection of sufficient resources from the
economy in an appropriate manner along with allocating and use of these resources
efficiently and effectively constitute good financial management. Resource
generation, resource allocation and expenditure management (resource
utilization) are the essential components of a public financial management system.
Public Finance Management (PFM) basically deals
with all aspects of resource mobilization and expenditure management in
government. Just as managing finances is a critical function of management in
any organization, similarly public finance management is an essential part of
the governance process. Public finance management includes resource
mobilization, prioritization of programmes, the budgetary process, efficient
management of resources and exercising controls. Rising aspirations of people
are placing more demands on financial resources. At the same time, the emphasis
of the citizenry is on value for money, thus making public finance management
increasingly vital. Taxes
Taxation is the central part of modern public
finance. Its significance arises not only from the fact that it is by far the
most important of all revenues but also because of the gravity of the problems
created by the present day heavy tax burden. The main objective of taxation is
raising revenue. A high level of taxation is necessary in a welfare State to fulfill
its obligations. Taxation is used as an instrument of attaining certain social
objectives i.e. as a means of redistribution of wealth and thereby reducing
inequalities. Taxation in a modern Government is thus needed not merely to
raise the revenue required to meet its ever-growing expenditure on
administration and social services but also to reduce the inequalities of
income and wealth. Taxation is also needed to draw away money that would
otherwise go into consumption and cause inflation to rise.[5]
§
A tax is a financial charge or
other levy imposed on an individual or a legal entity by a state or a functional equivalent of a state (for
example, tribes, secessionist movements Debt
Foreign currency reserves
and gold minus external debt based on 2010 data from CIA Factbook.
Governments, like any other legal entity, can
take out loans,
issue bonds and
make financial investments. Government debt (also
known as public debt or national debt) is money (or credit) owed by any level of government; either central or federal
government,municipal government or local government. Some local governments issue
bonds based on their taxing authority, such as tax increment bonds or revenue bonds.
As the government represents the people,
government debt can be seen as an indirect debt of the taxpayers.
Government debt can be categorized as internal debt, owed to lenders within the
country, and external debt, owed to foreign lenders.
Governments usually borrow by issuing securities such as government bonds and bills. Less creditworthy countries
sometimes borrow directly fromcommercial banks or international institutions such as
the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank.
Most government budgets are calculated on a cash
basis, meaning that revenues are recognized when collected and outlays are
recognized when paid. Some consider all government liabilities, including
future pension payments
and payments for goods and services the government has contracted for but not
yet paid, as government debt. This approach is called accrual accounting,
meaning that obligations are recognized when they are acquired, or accrued,
rather than when they are paid.
Ans5 Economic growth is the increase in the amount of the
goods and services produced by an economy over
time. It is conventionally measured as the percent rate of increase in real gross domestic
product, or real
GDP. Growth is usually calculated in real terms, i.e.inflation-adjusted terms, in order to net out the effect
of inflation on
the price of the goods and services produced. In economics, "economic growth" or
"economic growth theory" typically refers to growth of potential output, i.e., production at "full employment," which is caused by
growth in aggregate demand or observed output.
As an area of study, economic growth is generally distinguished from development economics.
The former is primarily the study of how countries can advance their economies.
The latter is the study of the economic aspects of the development process in
low-income countries.
As economic growth is measured as the annual
percent change of gross domestic product (GDP), it has all the advantages and
drawbacks of that measure. Economic growth versus
the business cycle
Economists distinguish between short-run
economic changes in production and long-run economic growth. Short-run
variation in economic growth is termed the business cycle.
Briefly, the business cycle is made up of booms and busts in production that
occur over a period of months or years. The most recent example of a business
cycle was the global boom starting in approximately 2002 that ended with the
late-2000 recession|bust of 2008–9. As discussed in the article on the business cycle,
economists attribute the ups and downs in the business cycle to a number of
causes including: overproduction of goods followed by large inventories that
can't be readily sold, overexpansion of credit resulting in piling up of debt
that inhibits purchasing; speculative bubbles, and shocks—like wars, political
upheavals, and so on.
In contrast, the topic of economic growth is concerned with the long-run trend
in production due to basic causes such as industrialization.
The business cycle moves up and down, creating fluctuations in the long-run
trend in economic growth.
Historical
sources of economic growth
Main article: Productivity
improving technologies (historical)
Increases in productivity are the main factor
responsible for economic growth, especially since the mid 19th century. Most of
the economic growth since that time been due to reduced inputs of labor,
materials, energy, capital and land per unit of economic output (less input per
widget). The balance of growth has come from using more inputs overall because
of the growth in output (more widgets).[1]
Opening up new territories was considered a
growth factor in the past, being important since the late 19th century and in
limited cases in the 20th century, such as the Amazon.
During colonial times, what ultimately mattered
for economic growth were the institutions and systems of government imported
through colonization.
There is a clear reversal of fortune between the poor and wealthy countries,
which is evident when comparing the method of colonialism in a region. Geography and endowments
of natural resources are not the sole determinants of GDP. In fact, those that
were blessed with good factor endowments experienced colonial extraction which
only provided limited rapid growth; whereas, countries that were less fortunate
in their original endowments experienced European settlement, relative
equality, and demand for rule of law.
These initially poor colonies end up developing an open franchise, equality,
and broad public education, which helps them experience greater economic growth
than the colonies that had exploited their economies of scale.
During the Industrial Revolution, mechanization began to replace hand methods in
manufacturing and new processes were developed to make chemicals, iron, steel
and other products.
Since the Industrial Revolution, a major factor of productivity was the substitution of energy from,
human and animal labor, water and wind power to electric power and
internal combustion. Since that replacement, the great expansion of total power
was driven by continuous improvements in energy conversion efficiency.[2] Other major historical
sources of productivity were automation,
transportation infrastructures (canals, railroads, and highways),[3] new materials (steel) and power, which
includes steam and internal combustion engines and electricity.
Other productivity improvements includedmechanized agriculture and scientific agriculture including
chemical fertilizers and livestock and poultry management,
and the Green Revolution. Interchangeable parts made with machine tools powered by electric motors evolved into mass production,
which is universally used today.
Productivity lowered the
cost of most items in terms of work time required to purchase. Real food prices
fell due to improvements in transportation and trade, mechanized agriculture, fertilizers,
scientific farming and the Green Revolution.
Great sources of productivity improvement in the
late 19th century were the railroads, steam ships, horse-pulled reapers and combine harvesters, and steam-powered
factories. The invention of processes for making cheap steel were important for many forms of mechanizationand
transportation. By the late 19th century, power and machinery were creating
overproduction, which eventually caused a reduction of the hourly work week.
Prices fell because less labor, materials, and energy were required to produce
and transport goods; however, workers real pay rose, allowing workers to
improve their diet and buy consumer goods and better housing.[4]
Mass production of the 1920s created overproduction,
which was arguably one of several causes of
the Great Depression of the 1930s.[5]Following
the Great Depression,
economic growth resumed, aided in part by demand for entirely new goods and
services, such as householdelectricity, telephones, radio, television, automobiles, and
household appliances, air conditioning, and commercial aviation (after 1950),
creating enough new demand to stabilize the work week.[6] Building of highway infrastructures
also contributed to post World War II growth, as did capital investments in
manufacturing and chemical industries. The post World War II economy also
benefited from the discovery of vast amounts of oil around the world,
particularly in the Middle East.
Economic growth in Western nations slowed after
1973, but growth in Asia has been strong since then, starting
with Japan and spreading to Korea, China, the Indian subcontinent and other parts of Asia. The Japanese
economic growth has slowed down considerably since late 1980s.
Economic
growth per capita
Often, the concern about economic growth focuses
on the desire to improve a country's standard of living—the level of goods and
services that, on average, individuals purchase or otherwise gain access to. It
should be noted that if population has grown along with economic production,
increases in GDP do not necessarily result in an
improvement in the standard of living. When the focus is on standard of living,
economic growth is expressed on a per capita basis.
Economic growth per capita is primarily driven
by improvements in productivity,
also called economic efficiency. Increased productivity
means producing more goods and services with the same inputs of labour,
capital, energy, and/or materials. For example, labour and land productivity in
agriculture were increased during the Green Revolution.
The Green Revolution of the 1940s to 1970s introduced new grain hybrids, which
increased yields around the world.
However, there is not necessarily a long term
one-to-one relationship between improvements in productivity and improvements
in average standard of living.[7] Among other factors that might prevent
a long-term improvement in standard of living despite economic growth is the
potential for population growth matching or outstripping productivity
improvements. When increased food supplies spur population growth rather than
an improvement in the standard of living, people are said to be caught in the
"Malthusian trap," named for Thomas Robert Malthus, the first observer to
detail out this dilemma. There is considerable controversy, for example, as to
whether the Green Revolution resulted in long-term improvements in the standard
of living as it was accompanied by rapid population growth creating population
sizes that may be unsustainable.[8]
Economic growth can also be of interest without
reference to per capita changes in standard of living. An example of this is
the economic growth in England during the Industrial Revolution. Certainly, per capita
increases in productivity occurred due to the replacement of hand labour by
machines. However, economic growth during this period was in large part so
dramatic because England's population simultaneously increased very rapidly
(1700 A.D. – 1860 A.D.). The two factors together, more production per worker
combined with many more workers, resulted in a sixfold increase in production
between 1700 and 1860. Population growth alone accounted for most of this
increase.[9]
Measuring
economic growth
Economic growth is measured as a percentage
change in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) or Gross National Product (GNP). These two measures, which are
calculated slightly differently, total the amounts paid for the goods and
services that a country produced. As an example of measuring economic growth, a
country which creates $9,000,000,000 in goods and services in 2010 and then
creates $9,090,000,000 in 2011, has a nominal economic growth rate of 1% for
2011.
In order to compare per capita economic growth
among countries, the total sales of the countries to be compared may be quoted
in a single currency. This requires converting the value of currencies of
various countries into a selected currency, for example U.S. dollars. One way
to do this conversion is to rely on exchange rates among the currencies, for example how
many Mexican pesos buy a single U.S. dollar? Another
approach is to use the purchasing power parity method. This method is based on how
much consumers must pay for the same "basket of goods" in each
country.
Inflation or deflation can make it difficult to measure
economic growth. If GDP, for example, goes up in a country by 1% in a year, was
this due solely to rising prices (inflation) or because more goods and services
were produced and saved? To express real growth rather than changes in prices
for the same goods, statistics on economic growth are often adjusted for
inflation or deflation.
For example, a table may show changes in GDP in
the period 1990 to 2000, as expressed in 1990 U.S. dollars. This means that the
single currency being used is the U.S. dollar with the purchasing power it had
in the U.S. in 1990. The table might mention that the figures are
"inflation-adjusted" or real. If no adjustment
were made for inflation, the table might make no mention of
inflation-adjustment or might mention that the prices are nominal.